Skip to content

Collaboration Is The New Competitive Advantage

2015 December 13
by Greg Satell

In 1985, a relatively unknown professor at Harvard Business School named Michael Porter published a book called Competitive Advantage, which explained that by optimizing every facet of the value chain, a firm could consistently outperform its competitors. The book was an immediate success and made Porter a management superstar.

Yet more recently Porter’s thinking has been called into question, most notably by Rita Gunther McGrath in her book The End of Competitive Advantage, which argued that sustainable competitive advantage is no longer possible and advised firms to seek out transient advantage.

In truth, neither view fully represents today’s business environment. Certainly, companies like Apple and Southwest are still able to dominate their industries, but the source of advantage has changed. We no longer compete in a resource economy, but a semantic economy where firms that can build, manage and widen connections win out.

Shifting From Assertiveness To Empathy

The old economy was relatively simple.  Every business had various cost centers and revenue streams that were largely separate and distinct. So Porter’s strategy of breaking down the value chain to its component parts made a lot of sense. By optimizing each business driver, you could minimize costs, maximize profits and increase margins.

What’s more, this optimization process had a cumulative effect. By creating the right incentives, such as pay for performance and letting each business unit “eat what they kill,” firms could invest back into the business, increasing resources that would lead to further competitive advantages. Even a small edge, compounded over time, could be decisive.

Yet today, success is not driven by the resources you control, but those you can access. Increasingly, rather than owning resources and capabilities outright, we use platforms to access ecosystems of technology, talent and information. The path to success no longer lies in clawing your way to the top of the heap, but in nudging your way to the center of the network.

That’s why Geoff Colvin argues in Humans Are Underrated that the most critical 21st century skill is empathy and calls for a shift in emphasis from “knowledge workers” to “relationship workers.” In a world of exponentially increasing complexity, no one person or firm can do it all, so those that can work well with others have a distinct advantage.

A Radical Shift Toward Design

Another major 21st century transformation has been the shift from atoms to bits. In the old industrial economy, value was mostly created through massive capital spending on plants and equipment. This was a huge barrier to entry that reinforced and propagated competitive advantage through economies of scale.

Yet today we’re seeing a radical shift toward design as a driver of value. After all, Google’s algorithms don’t cost any more to run then anybody else’s and Apple’s products don’t have significant capabilities that rival products lack.  Rather,it is their products’ design—how they interface with both users and other products and services—that makes them valuable.

What’s more, with advanced manufacturing techniques such as 3D printing and robotics, the same trends are beginning to drive the economics of even wholly physical products. When production becomes automated, every product is an informational object with design at its core. This development is so important that many are calling it a new industrial revolution.

Finally, as Jon Kolko points out in Harvard Business Review, the emphasis on design is just as important in how we run our organizations as it is in how we develop products. Everywhere you look, design has become a central driver of value rather than an afterthought.

Breaking Down Silos And Networking The Organization

We’ve come to take it for granted that we live in a connected age, yet the truth is that much remains separate and disparate.  As Gillian Tett explains in The Silo Effect, all too often we work in highly specialized areas that are unable to integrate with each other. When dealing with highly complex environments, these silos create distinct disadvantages.

For example, she cites Sony’s inability to integrate its far-flung divisions as the reason that, despite its various efforts to create a digital music player, it lost out to the more holistically designed Apple iPod.  She also points out that silos contributed to the recent financial crisis, because important risks were tucked away in little noticed parts of the economy.

Yet Tett also argues that silos aren’t inevitable and points to Facebook’s policy of having every new employee go through a six week “boot camp” as a way to create connections across the organization.  (We had a similar policy at my former company and had similar results.) Every enterprise today needs to think seriously about how to network their organization.

Notice again the stark contrast to Porter’s vision of value chain components. In his view, by optimizing disparate parts, you make the whole stronger. Yet today, agility trumps strategy and we need to think in terms of networks rather than nodes.

The New Economy Is A Social Economy

Clearly, the world has become more complex. Economic development, technology and globalization have all helped blur the lines of old boundaries to such an extent that we desperately need to reexamine old rules, processes and practices.  We can no longer take anything for granted.

That means we need to break free of the reductionist approaches of the past. The basic premise of Porter’s competitive advantage—that you can increase the whole by optimizing each of the the parts in isolation—has become untenable.  Rather, we need to use platforms to access ecosystems of technology, talent and information.

At the same time, machine intelligence is quickly replacing human cognitive power much like machines began to replace muscle power over a century ago.  More and more, what drives value is the ability to collaborate with both humans and machines.  That is where advantage lies today.

That’s why today’s economy is a social economy with collaboration at its center. In the past, we could dominate by accumulating resources and driving efficiency, but now agility and interoperability that rule the day.  We need to shift our focus from assets and capabilities to empathy, design and networked organizations.

– Greg

8 Responses leave one →
  1. December 13, 2015

    Yes, the new collaborative way of working needs a new breed of worker who, among other things, possesses the ability to be ‘assertively selfless’ as and when required. I explore this aspect and other characteristics of this new breed here: I also agree that the new economy is underpinned by new rules or principles that reverse past thinking and practices. I explore four principles for thriving within the weird new world of collaborative working here:

  2. December 13, 2015

    Thanks for sharing Charles.

    – Greg

  3. Eli Cummings permalink
    December 13, 2015

    I am skeptical of any humanistic face that is put on the behavior of corporations and equally skeptical of the fashions promulgated by management consultants. If the link below is reasonably accurate in terms of percent of assets that are intangible then the trend has been clear for some time and shows why there has been continuous lobbying for laws that benefit holders of so called intellectual property.

    The economic paradigm at work has been to maximize what has been coined rent seeking.

    The corporate manor lords of today have used law to build the moats around their castles.

    At some point the faith that the average person has in what can only be called the false economic and business myths promulgated by leaders of government and multi-nationals must surely weaken.

    Maybe then there can be an honest conversation regarding what parts of economics are more like religious doctrines and those parts that are backed up by actual evidence.

  4. Tony Carr permalink
    January 4, 2016

    You are wise beyond your years. The article is worth its weight in GOLD. Bravo!!!

  5. January 29, 2016

    This is an excellent piece. These two lines jumped out at me:

    “Today, success is not driven by the resources you control, but those you can access.”

    “In a world of exponentially increasing complexity, no one person or firm can do it all, so those that can work well with others have a distinct advantage.”

    Back in the day I managed a collaboration between 12 public media organizations. The experience led me to partner with Mark Glaser at MediaShift (who brought in the folks at UC Berkeley’s J-school as partners) to launch a website called Collaboration Central, where we covered the rise of collaboration in media and journalism and highlighted innovative collaborations from other industries as well. You can see it here:

    One of the biggest lessons I learned is: Collaboration is not efficient, but (and), it yields better results. I think both parts of this are critical. When we sing the praises of collaboration it is critical to note that collaboration requires a very special kind of management — and a layer of management that didn’t exist before. But we can’t let this be a deterrent because the potential for collaboration to harness diverse talents and resources and produce a far greater result/product/outcome is exponential.

    Anyway, this is an excellent article, and I’ve enjoyed a number of other pieces I’ve seen you share on Twitter lately, too! Glad to have “found” you.

  6. January 29, 2016

    Oops, forgot the link to Collaboration Central:

  7. January 29, 2016

    Thanks Amanda. I’ve been a longtime fan of MediaShift. Collaboration central seems like a great idea!

    – Greg

  8. January 29, 2016

    Thanks. That’s helpful:-)

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS